The National Assessment and Accreditation Council advocated the establishment of Internal Quality assurance Cell (IQAC) by all the accredited institutions .C P PATEL & F H SHAH COMMERCE COLLEGE, ANAND was established in the year 1970 . Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) of the College was established on 15th June 2009, as the post accreditation quality sustenance activity. The IQAC plans, guides and monitors Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Enhancement (QE) activities of the college.


“To Pursue global standards of excellence in all our endeavours encompassing teaching, research, consultancy and continuing education and to remain focused in our core and support functions and in that direction to hold ourselves accountable to our stakeholders, through embedded processes of self-evaluation and continuous improvement”


    As per the directives of the Govt of Gujarat, a student should enrol himself/herself for at least one of the following Dharas :
  • (1) Development and application of quality benchmarks / parameters for the various academic and administrative activities of the institution.
  • (2) Preparation of the Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) to be submitted to NAAC based on the quality parameters.
  • (3) Vanguard the conduct of internal and external Academic Audits of departments to promote quality, accountability and transparency
  • (4) Dissemination of information on the various quality parameters of higher education.
  • (5) Organization of workshops, seminars on quality related themes and promotion of quality circles.
  • (6) Documentation of the various programmes / activities leading to quality improvement.
  • (7) Optimization and integration of modern methods of teaching, learning and evaluation.
  • (8) Ensuring the adequacy, maintenance and functioning of the support structure.
  • (9) To obtain feedback responses from students, parents and other stakeholders on quality-related institutional processes.

Composition of IQAC.pdf

Minutes Of Meeting.pdf

IQAC MINUTES AND ATR 2020-21-22.pdf


Feedback Analysis

  1. 1) Feedback analysis report signed by the Principal
  1. 2) Department wise Action taken Report on feedback signed by the competent authority
  1. 3) Document showing the communication with the affiliating University for the Feedback provided
  1. 4) Action taken by the affiliating university on the feedback.




  1. 1) Feedback analysis report signed by the Principal
  1. 2) Department wise Action taken Report on feedback signed by the competent authority
  1. 3) Document showing the communication with the affiliating University for the Feedback provided
  1. 4) Action taken by the affiliating university on the feedback.

Post Accreditation Details.pdf

Action Taken Report.pdf

Academic Audits.pdf



AQAR 2018-2019.pdf

AQAR 2019-2020.pdf


Extended Profile

  •     1.1 Number of courses offered by the Institution across all programs during the last five years
  •     1.2 Number of programs offered year-wise for last five years
  •     2.1 Number of students year wise during the last five years
  •     2.2 Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State Govt rule year wise during the last five years
  •     2.3 Number of outgoing/ final year students year wise during the last five years
  •     3.1 Number of full time teachers year-wise during the last five years
  •     3.2 Number of sanctioned posts year-wise during last five years
  •     4.1 Total number of Classrooms and Seminar halls
  •     4.2 Total expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs)
  •     4.3 Number of Computers


  • Criterion 1 Curricular Aspects

  • 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation
  •   1.1.1 The Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well planned and documented process
  •   1.1.2 The institution adheres to the academic calendar including for the conduct of CIE
  •   1.1.3 Teachers of the Institution participate in following activities related to curriculum development and assessment of the affiliating University and/are represented on the following academic bodies during the last five years
  • 1.2 Academic Flexibility
  •   1.2.1 Percentage of Programmes in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/ elective course system has been implemented
  •   1.2.2 Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years
  •   1.2.3 Average percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on programs as against the total number of students during the last five years
  • 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
  •   1.3.1 Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum
  •   1.3.2 Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work/field work/internship during last five years
  •   1.3.3 Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 1.4 Feedback System
  •   1.4.1 Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction at the institution from the following stakeholders 1) Students 2)Teachers 3)Employers 4)Alumni
  •   1.4.2 Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as follows
  • Criterion 2 Teaching- Learning and Evaluation

  • 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
  •   2.1.1 Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
  •   2.1.2 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years ( exclusive of supernumerary seats)
  • 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
  •   2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners
  •   2.2.2 Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 2.3 Teaching- Learning Process
  •   2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
  •   2.3.2 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process.
  •   2.3.3 Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues
  • 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
  •   2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
  •   2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years
  •   2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution
  • 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
  •   2.5.1 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode
  •   2.5.2 Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient
  • 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome
  •   2.6.1 Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.
  •   2.6.2 Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.
  •   2.6.3 Average pass percentage of Students during last five years
  • 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
  •   2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.
  • Criterion 3 Research, Innovations and Extension

  • 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research
  •   3.1.1 Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects, endowments, Chairs in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
  •   3.1.2 Percentage of teachers recognized as research guides (latest completed academic year)
  •   3.1.3 Percentage of departments having Research projects funded by government and non government agencies during the last five years
  • 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem
  •   3.2.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge
  •   3.2.2 Number of workshops/seminars conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years
  • 3.3 Research Publication and Awards
  •   3.3.1 Number of Ph.Ds registered per eligible teacher during the last five years
  •   3.3.2 Number of research papers per teachers in the Journals notified on UGC website during the last five years
  •   3.3.3 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years
  • 3.4 Extension Activities
  •   3.4.1 Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof during the last five years.
  •   3.4.2 Number of awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government/ government recognised bodies during the last five years
  •   3.4.3 Number of extension and outreach Programmes conducted by the institution through NSS/ NCC/ Red Cross/ YRC etc., ( including the programmes such as Swachh Bharat, AIDS awareness, Gender issues etc. )and/or those organised in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs during the last five years
  •   3.4.4 Average percentage of students participating in extension activities at 3.4.3. above during last five years
  • 3.5 Collaboration
  •   3.5.1 Number of Collaborative activities for research, Faculty exchange, Student exchange/ internship per year
  •   3.5.2 Number of functional MoUs with institutions, other universities, industries, corporate houses etc. during the last five years
  • Criterion 4 Infrastructure and Learning Resources

  • 4.1 Physical Facilities
  •   4.1.1 The Institution has adequate infrastructure and physical facilities for teaching- learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc.
  •   4.1.2 The Institution has adequate facilities for cultural activities, sports, games (indoor, outdoor), gymnasium, yoga centre etc.
  •   4.1.3 Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT- enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS, etc.
  •   4.1.4 Average percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation during last five years(INR in Lakhs)
  • 4.2 Library as a learning Resource
  •   4.2.1 Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS)
  •   4.2.2 The institution has subscription for the e-resources
  •   4.2.3 Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/e-books and subscription to journals/e- journals during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
  •   4.2.4 Percentage per day usage of library by teachers and students ( foot falls and login data for online access)(Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 4.3 IT Infrastructure
  •   4.3.1 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi
  •   4.3.2 Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  •   4.3.3 Bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution
  • 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
  •   4.4.1 Average percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical and academic support facilities) excluding salary component during the last five years(INR in Lakhs)
  •   4.4.2 There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities – laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.
  • Criterion 5 Student Support and Progression

  • 5.1 Student Support
  •   5.1.1 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government during last five years
  •   5.1.2 Average percentage of students benefitted by scholarships, freeships etc. provided by the institution / non- government agencies during the last five years
  •   5.1.3 Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution
  •   5.1.4 Average percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the Institution during the last five years
  •   5.1.5 The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances
  • 5.2 Student Progression
  •   5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years
  •   5.2.2 Average percentage of students progressing to higher education during the last five years
  •   5.2.3 AAverage percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years (eg: JAM/CLAT/GATE/ GMAT/CAT/GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/State government examinations)
  • 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
  •   5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at university/state/national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years.
  •   5.3.2 Institution facilitates students’ representation and engagement in various administrative, co-curricular and extracurricular activities (student council/ students representation on various bodies as per established processes and norms )
  •   5.3.3 Average number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution/other institutions)
  • 5.4 Alumni Engagement
  •   5.4.1 There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services
  •   5.4.2 Alumni contribution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
  • Criterion 6 Governance, Leadership and Management

  • 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
  •   6.1.1 The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution
  •   6.1.2 The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management.
  • 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
  •   6.2.1 The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed
  •   6.2.2 The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
  •   6.2.3 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
  • 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
  •   6.3.1 The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff
  •   6.3.2 Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years
  •   6.3.3 Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years
  •   6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face Faculty development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years
  •   6.3.5 Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff
  • 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
  •   6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
  •   6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III)
  •   6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources
  • 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
  •   6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes
  •   6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities
  •   6.5.3 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
  • Criterion 7 Institutional Values and Best Practices

  • 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
  •   7.1.1 Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years.
  •   7.1.2 The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy
  •   7.1.3 Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the following
  •   7.1.4 Water conservation facilities available in the Institution:
  •   7.1.5 Green campus initiatives include:
  •   7.1.6 Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution.
  •   7.1.7 The Institution has disabled-friendly, barrier free environment
  •   7.1.8 Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and other diversities (within 500 words).
  •   7.1.9 Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens
  •   7.1.10 The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes in this regard.
  •   7.1.11 Institution celebrates / organizes national and international commemorative days, events and festivals
  • 7.2 Best Practices
  •   7.2.1 Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual.
  • 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
  •   7.3.1 Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words